(HC) Pierce v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20221:22-cv-00107California423 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT MATTHEW PIERCE, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-0107 JLT HBK (HC) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING v. ) PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, ) AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CLOSE CASE ) Respondent. ) (Docs. 17) ) 16 The assigned magistrate judge conducted a preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases,1 and issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that the amended Petition be dismissed for failure to state a claim and failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (Doc. 17.) The Findings and Recommendations contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within 14 days after service. (Id. at 5.) The Court advised Petitioner “that failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” (Id., citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014); Baxter v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.