Adams
(PC) Williams v. Adams
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20221:19-cv-01058California447 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KENTRELL WILLIAMS, 1:19-cv-01058-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF
TO FILE OPPOSITION OR
vs. STATEMENT OF NON-
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT
ADAMS, et al., CDCR’S MOTION TO DISMISS
WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
Defendants. (ECF No. 24.)
17 On April 1, 2022, defendant CDCR (“Defendant”) filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 24.) Kentrell Williams (“Plaintiff”) was required to file an opposition or a statement of non- opposition to the motion within twenty-one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 230(l). Local Rule 230(l) provides that the failure to oppose a motion “may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . .” The court may deem any failure to oppose Defendant’s motion to dismiss as a waiver, and recommend that the motion be granted on that basis. Failure to follow a district court’s local rules is a proper grounds for dismissal. U.S. v. Warren, 601…