Adams

(PC) Williams v. Adams

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20221:19-cv-01058California447 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENTRELL WILLIAMS, 1:19-cv-01058-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF

TO FILE OPPOSITION OR

vs. STATEMENT OF NON-

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT

ADAMS, et al., CDCR’S MOTION TO DISMISS

WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

Defendants. (ECF No. 24.)

17 On April 1, 2022, defendant CDCR (“Defendant”) filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 24.) Kentrell Williams (“Plaintiff”) was required to file an opposition or a statement of non- opposition to the motion within twenty-one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 230(l). Local Rule 230(l) provides that the failure to oppose a motion “may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . .” The court may deem any failure to oppose Defendant’s motion to dismiss as a waiver, and recommend that the motion be granted on that basis. Failure to follow a district court’s local rules is a proper grounds for dismissal. U.S. v. Warren, 601…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.