Shockley

(HC) Castro-Gutierrez v. Shockley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20222:21-cv-02128California503 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HERIBERTO CASTRO-GUITERREZ, No. 2:21-cv-2128 KJM DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER DORIS L. SHOCKLEY, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 1, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendation, which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations and he requests a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.