Shergill
Gilbert v. Shergill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00413-DAD-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE
COURT TO TERMINATE NAJAR A.
v. SHERGILL AS A DEFENDANT IN THIS
ACTION
NAJAR A. SHERGILL, et al., (ECF No. 11) Defendants.
16 On May 20, 2022, the parties filed a stipulated notice of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) of Defendant Najar A. Shergill dba Quick N Save. (ECF No. 11.) The dismissal of this Defendant is without prejudice. (Id.) The claims against the other named Defendants are not subject to the stipulation and will remain active. (Id.) Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The plaintiff may dismiss either some or all of the defendants—or some or all of his claims—through a Rule…