Orr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH WILSON, No. 2:20-cv-1715 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER F. ORR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has filed a motion to compel the production of documents. ECF No. 40. Although the motion identifies the documents that plaintiff seeks to compel, it does not reproduce the requests that were sent to defendants. See id. at 2. Plaintiff has also failed to provide defendants’ responses to the requests. Id. The Court does not hold prisoners proceeding pro se to the same standards that it holds attorneys. However, at a minimum, as the moving party plaintiff bears the burden of informing the court of which discovery requests are the subject of his motion to compel and, for each disputed response, why defendant’s objection is not justified. 25 Waterbury v. Scribner, No. 1:05-cv-0764 OWW DLB PC,…