Covello
(HC) Newbery v. Covello
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GUSTAVO D. NEWBERY, No. 2:20-cv-2167 KJM DB Petitioner, v. ORDER PATRICK COVELLO, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner alleges he is entitled to relief because his trial counsel was ineffective in violation of his rights under the Sixth Amendment. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 22, 2021, [9/23/21] the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 18.) Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207,…