DeJoy

Ferrell, Jr. v. DeJoy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20221:21-cv-01796California629 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 TERRENCE JESSE FERRELL, JR., Case No. 1:21-cv-01796-DAD-SKO

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED FOR

v. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY

WITH THE COURT’S ORDER AND FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

LOUIS DEJOY, et al., (Doc. 11)

Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff Terrence Jesse Ferrell, Jr. is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed his complaint on December 21, 2021. (Doc. 1). On April 11, 2022, the undersigned screened the complaint, concluding that Plaintiff stated no cognizable claims but providing Plaintiff with options to proceed. (Doc. 11.) Within 30 days of the date of service of the screening order, Plaintiff could file either an amended complaint or a statement that he wishes to stand on his original complaint and have it reviewed by the presiding district judge. (Id. at 2, 12.) Plaintiff was warned 23 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.