DeJoy
Ferrell, Jr. v. DeJoy
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 TERRENCE JESSE FERRELL, JR., Case No. 1:21-cv-01796-DAD-SKO
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED FOR
v. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY
WITH THE COURT’S ORDER AND FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
LOUIS DEJOY, et al., (Doc. 11)
Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE
16 Plaintiff Terrence Jesse Ferrell, Jr. is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed his complaint on December 21, 2021. (Doc. 1). On April 11, 2022, the undersigned screened the complaint, concluding that Plaintiff stated no cognizable claims but providing Plaintiff with options to proceed. (Doc. 11.) Within 30 days of the date of service of the screening order, Plaintiff could file either an amended complaint or a statement that he wishes to stand on his original complaint and have it reviewed by the presiding district judge. (Id. at 2, 12.) Plaintiff was warned 23 …