(SS) Vincent v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20222:21-cv-00926California4,288 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBIN LYNN BIRDSONG VINCENT, No. 2:21-cv-926-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF Nos. 15/17, 18.) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits. In her summary judgment motion, plaintiff contends the Administrative Law Judge erred in finding her alleged mental impairments non-severe at step two and in omitting any mental limitations from her residual functional capacity. The Commissioner opposed and filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the court DENIES plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, GRANTS the Commissioner’s cross-motion, and AFFIRMS the final decision of the Commissioner. /// /// 27 1 This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(15), and both parties consented to proceed before a Magistrate Judge for all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.