Stiles

Stiles v. Safeco Insurance

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20222:20-cv-01731California434 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] Sharidan Stiles, No. 2:20-cv-01731-KJM-DMC Plaintiff, ORDER v. General Insurance Company of America and Does 1 through 20, Defendants. 17 Sharidan Stiles alleges General Insurance Company of America wrongly and in bad faith denied insurance claims related to damages her home sustained in the 2018 Carr Fire. See Second Am. Compl. 5-14, ECF No. 27. General moves to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), arguing Stiles filed this lawsuit after the applicable one-year limitations period. See generally Mot., ECF No. 40; Mem., ECF No. 40-1. The motion is fully briefed and the court submitted it without a 23 hearing. See generally Opp’n, ECF No. 38; Reply, ECF No. 43; Min. Order, ECF No. 44. “To dismiss a complaint on statute of limitations grounds, it must appear ‘beyond doubt 25 that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts that would establish the timeliness of the claim.’” 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.