Williams v. Drakaina Logistics

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20221:21-cv-01436California425 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Case No.: 1:21-cv-1436 JLT SKO Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. THE ACTION

DRAKAINA LOGISTICS, et al., (Doc. 11) Defendants.

16 Prince Paul Raymond Williams asserts he suffered violations of his civil rights and federal criminal statutes. (See Doc. 4.) The assigned magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim and granted Plaintiff leave to amend the complaint within 21 days. (Doc. 6.) The Court advised Plaintiff that if he failed to file an amended complaint, the magistrate judge would “recommend… this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim and to obey a court order.” (Id. at 12, emphasis omitted.) After Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, the magistrate judge issued an order to show cause why the action should not be dismissed or to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 10.) Again, Plaintiff did not respond to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.