(SS) Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 25, 20221:19-cv-00815California1,155 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEE D. TAYLOR Case No. 1:19-cv-00815-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO

CORRECT

v. (Doc. No. 20) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

ORDER FOR CLERK TO MAIL A COPY OF Defendant. THIS ORDER TO PLAINTIFF

17 18 Presently before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Correct Order Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). (Doc. No. 20). On April 13, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff’s counsel Steven G. Rosales of the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing’s (“Counsel”) motion for attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Doc. No. 19). On May 16, 2022, Counsel and the Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) filed a joint motion to correct the Court’s April 13, 2022 order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). (Doc. No. 20). For the reasons set forth below, the joint motion to correct the Court’s April 13, 2022 order is granted. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.