(PC)Hill

(PC)Hill v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20222:21-cv-01798California357 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CYMEYON HILL, No. 2:21-cv-1798 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER KATHLEEN ALLISON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 19, 2022 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 6. On January 27, 2022, plaintiff filed a document entered on the docket as objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff raises no substantive objections to the findings and recommendations; rather, he writes, “I do not accept this offer to contract and do not consent to these proceedings,” and attaches…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.