Rocha

(PC) Ramos v. Rocha

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 25, 20222:19-cv-00726California321 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL AJURIA RAMOS, No. 2:19-cv-0726 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS I. ROCHA, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed March 22, 2022, plaintiff was granted sixty days to file a pretrial statement. Plaintiff has not filed a pretrial statement or otherwise responded to the court’s order. The court will therefore recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 110. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants are relieved from filing a pretrial statement. 2. The pretrial conference set for August 1, 2022, is vacated; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 110. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.