Sherman

(PC) Rayford v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20221:19-cv-00225California16,770 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EUGENE RAYFORD, 1:19-cv-00225-AWI-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, AMENDED FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS,

v. RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SHERMAN, et al., BE GRANTED (ECF No. 44.) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

17 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Eugene Rayford (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on January 11, 2021, against defendants Stu Sherman (Warden, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison) and Richard Milam (Supervisor of Building Trades) (“Defendants”) for subjecting Plaintiff to adverse conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 24.) On December 13, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.