Sherman
(PC) Rayford v. Sherman
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20221:19-cv-00225California16,770 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EUGENE RAYFORD, 1:19-cv-00225-AWI-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, AMENDED FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS,
v. RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SHERMAN, et al., BE GRANTED (ECF No. 44.) Defendants.
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS
17 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Eugene Rayford (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on January 11, 2021, against defendants Stu Sherman (Warden, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison) and Richard Milam (Supervisor of Building Trades) (“Defendants”) for subjecting Plaintiff to adverse conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 24.) On December 13, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for summary…