Alweiss

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 DANIEL ALWEISS, individually and No. 2:21-cv-00784-JAM-DB as a class representative for all similarly situated permit applicants who are class members, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES 15 v. 16 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 Daniel Alweiss (“Plaintiff”) sued the City of Sacramento and Planning Department agents Thomas Pace and Teresa Haenggi (collectively “Defendants”) for collecting a fee in connection with Plaintiff’s conditional use permit application. See Compl., ECF No. 1. On December 27, 2021, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s federal claims with prejudice and declined supplemental jurisdiction over his state claims. See Order, ECF No. 12. /// /// This matter is now before the Court on Defendants’ motion for attorney’s fees. See Def.’s Mot. for Attorney’s Fees (“Mot.”), ECF No. 14. Plaintiff opposes the motion. See Opp’n, ECF No. 15. Defendants replied. See Reply, ECF No.…