Brunk

(PC) Harris v. Brunk

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 25, 20221:22-cv-00302California1,105 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARVIN HARRIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00302-AWI-BAK (EPG) (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v.

FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT

D. BRUNK, et al., ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Defendants. (Doc. No. 15)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 18 Plaintiff Marvin Harris is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 15, 2022, Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a complaint asserting a First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendants. (ECF No. 1.) On March 17, 2022, the Court entered an Order requiring Plaintiff to pay the $402.00 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis within forty-five days. (ECF No. 5.) The Court warned Plaintiff, “Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action.” (Id.) More than forty-five days has passed, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.