Luevanos

(PC) Bolds v. Luevanos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20221:21-cv-01668California554 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JON-ERIK ROOSEVELT BOLDS, JR., ) Case No. 1:21-cv-01668-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN

CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS, AND DENYING

LEUVANOS, et al., ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF ) TIME AS UNNECESSARY Defendants. ) ) (ECF Nos. 22, 28, 29) )

Plaintiff Jon-Erik Roosevelt Bolds, Jr., is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 15, 2022, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found a cognizable excessive force claims against Defendant Luevanos for the incident on May 28, 2021, and against Defendants Luevanos, Valluas, Lucos, Magania, and Flores for the incident on September 21, 2021, and a cognizable retaliation claim against Defendants Lucos, Sosa, Bailey, Rafferty, and Espericueta. (ECF No. 22.) However, Plaintiff fails to state any other cognizable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.