Luevanos
(PC) Bolds v. Luevanos
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JON-ERIK ROOSEVELT BOLDS, JR., ) Case No. 1:21-cv-01668-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN
CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS, AND DENYING
LEUVANOS, et al., ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF ) TIME AS UNNECESSARY Defendants. ) ) (ECF Nos. 22, 28, 29) )
Plaintiff Jon-Erik Roosevelt Bolds, Jr., is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 15, 2022, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found a cognizable excessive force claims against Defendant Luevanos for the incident on May 28, 2021, and against Defendants Luevanos, Valluas, Lucos, Magania, and Flores for the incident on September 21, 2021, and a cognizable retaliation claim against Defendants Lucos, Sosa, Bailey, Rafferty, and Espericueta. (ECF No. 22.) However, Plaintiff fails to state any other cognizable…