Fisher
(HC) Bisel v. Fisher
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY EUGENE BISEL, Case No.: 1:17-cv-00013-DAD-SKO (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO INCLUDE
LATE DISCOVERY
[Doc. 77] v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO
DENY MOTION FOR TEMPORARY
RAY FISHER, JR., et al., RESTRAINING ORDER AND STAY OF
PAROLE CONDITIONS
Respondents. [Doc. 76]
[21-DAY DEADLINE] 18 Petitioner is a state parolee proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 4, 2021, Respondent filed an answer to the first amended petition. (Doc. 65.) On February 28, 2022, Petitioner filed a traverse to the answer. (Doc. 72.) On April 29, 2022, Petitioner filed a motion for a temporary restraining order. (Doc. 76.) On May 23, 2022, Petitioner filed a motion for leave to include late discovery. (Doc. 77.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the…