CDCR

(PC) Gomez v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 25, 20222:20-cv-00198California628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFREDO GOMEZ, No. 2:20-cv-0198 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 18, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. See ECF No. 7. On July 1, 2021, after receiving an extension of time, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF Nos. 11, 12. On July 16, 2021, plaintiff filed a document styled “Plaintiffs’ submittion [sic] of new information and declaration of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.