Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID PERRYMAN, Case No. 2:21-cv-00421-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

WARDEN,

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

Defendant. DAYS 16 On January 21, 2022, the court screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint, notified him that it failed to state a claim, and gave him thirty days to file a second amended complaint. ECF No. 20. The court subsequently granted plaintiff an extension until April 4, 2022, to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 22. Despite that extension, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres.…