(PC) Meeks v. Butte County Sheriff's Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20222:22-cv-00472California2,070 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANAI SERENE OPAL MEEKS, No. 2: 22-cv-0472 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

BUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is former county prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.