Pizana

Pizana v. Sanmedica International LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20221:18-cv-00644California1,764 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 RAUL PIZANA, MAUREEN HOBBS, No. 1:18-cv-00644-DAD-SKO

CHARLES BERGLUND, JEANETTE

MILLS, ERICA LAROCHE, ANN ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO QUASH

MARIE LYNCH,OSKAR LAFFONT, AND VACATING HEARING

SAL MUNOZ, and KEITH BARNES, individually and on behalf of all others (Docs. 173 & 174) similarly situated,

Plaintiffs, v. BASIC RESEARCH, LLC, et al., Defendants. 14 This matter is before the Court on Defendant SanMedica International, LLC (“Defendant”)’s “Motion to Quash Subpoena to Small Business Administration Holdings, Inc.” (Doc. 173) and “Motion to Quash Subpoena to Zions Bancorporation, N.A. (d/b/a Zions Bank)” (Doc. 174) (the “Motions to Quash”). Defendant and Plaintiff Raul Pizana (“Plaintiff”) filed their joint statement directed to the Motions to Quash (the “Joint Statement”), as required by this Court’s Local Rule 251, on May 18, 2022. (Doc. 176.) Having considered the Joint Statement and its exhibits, and for the reasons set forth below, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.