Mendoza

(PC) Venegas v. Mendoza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20221:21-cv-00962California1,120 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SALVADOR VENEGAS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00692-DAD-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO

EXCHANGE DOCUMENTS

v.

E. MENDOZA, et al., Defendant(s). 14 Salvador Venegas (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 15, 2022, the Court issued an order requiring the parties to file scheduling and discovery statements. (ECF No. 35). The parties have now filed their statements. (ECF Nos. 39, 45). The Court has reviewed this case and the parties’ statements. In an effort to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive disposition of this action,1 the Court will direct that certain documents that are central to the dispute be promptly produced.2

1 See, e.g., United States v. W.R. Grace, 526 F.3d 499, 508-09 (9th Cir. 2008) (“We begin with the principle that the district court is charged with effectuating the speedy and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.