J.P.
J.P. v. City of Stockton
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo----
J.P., a minor, by and through No. 2:21-CV-00788 WBS AC CHANNY SOK-HANG as guardian, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v.
CITY OF STOCKTON, STOCKTON
POLICE DEPARTMENT, STANLEY MCFADDEN, JORGE ANDRADE and DOE 1 to 10, Defendants. 19 ----oo0oo---- STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER After reviewing the parties’ Joint Status Report, the court hereby vacates the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for June 6, 2022, and makes the following findings and orders without needing to consult with the parties any further. I. SERVICE OF PROCESS All defendants have been served, and no further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). II. JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENTS The parties do not anticipate further amendment to the pleadings, but because defendants represent that they have not seen plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint…