Ford

Ford v. Kern High School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20221:22-cv-00159California482 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OTHA FORD, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-0159 JLT BAK (SAB) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING THE v. ) ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE ) KERN HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., ) (Doc. 9) ) Defendants. ) ) )

Otha Ford, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this action asserting she suffered “9 years of medical negligence;” discrimination, harassment, and prejudice in the workplace; negligence; and denial of a worker’s compensation claim. (See Doc. 1 at 4-6.) The assigned magistrate judge screened the complaint and determined Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim. (Doc. 5.) Plaintiff then filed an amended complaint, which the magistrate judge determined did not include a cognizable claim and dismissed with leave to amend. (Docs. 6, 7.) Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint, asserting the Kern High School District was “defaming 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.