Hallmon

Hallmon v. Stanislaus County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20221:19-cv-01623California851 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRITANIE HALLMON, No. 1:19-cv-01623-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION DUE TO

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

STANISLAUS COUNTY,

Defendant.

16 Plaintiff Britanie Hallmon, proceeding pro se, filed her complaint initiating this action on August 23, 2019, which was screened by the assigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. (See Doc. Nos. 1, 2, 10, 12.) On June 8, 2020, the undersigned adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations recommending that all of plaintiff’s claims be dismissed except for her Title VII employment discrimination claim brought against defendant Stanislaus County. (Doc. No. 18.) On October 2, 2020, defendant filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. (Doc. No. 19.) Plaintiff did not file a response to that motion. On April 29, 2021, the court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss with leave to amend (Doc. No. 23), and on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.