Kaur

Gilbert v. Kaur

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20221:22-cv-00439California175 words

Trial Court Opinion

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 9} DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00439-DAD-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE

Vv. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE

KAMAL PREET KAUR, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE

Defendants. (ECF No. 5) 14 On May 26, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. (ECF No. 5.) In light of 16 the notice of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. 17 City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust 19 the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le 49 Dated: _May 27, 2022 :

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28