Alonzo

Alonzo v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 31, 20221:20-cv-01682California1,814 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VALENTINO ALONZO, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-1682 JLT HBK ) Plaintiffs, ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION ) TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING THE ACTION v. ) WITHOUT PREJUDICE ) WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., ) (Doc. 19) ) Defendants. ) )

Valentino Alonzo is a former employee of Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., and asserts he suffered retaliation and wrongful termination following his return from leave. Wal-Mart seeks dismissal of the action pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 19.) Because Alonzo failed to prosecute this action and failed to comply with the Local Rules, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED. I. Procedural History Alonzo initiated this action by filing a complaint in Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 20CECG02147, on July 23, 2020. (Doc. 1-1 at 9.) At that time, Alonzo was represented by counsel, Abraham Mathew. (See id. at 26.). Wal-Mart initiated the matter before this Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.