(SS)(PS) Hall v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 27, 20222:19-cv-00132California1,271 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANQUENITA SCHTEKA HALL, No. 2:19-CV-0132-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brought this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Pursuant to the written consent of all parties, this case was before the undersigned as the presiding judge for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). On October 8, 2020, mail directed to Plaintiff was returned by the United States Postal Service as undeliverable. Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 183(b), any party appearing pro se must file and serve a notice of change of address within 63 days of mail being returned. As of January 12, 2021, more than 63 days had elapsed since mail was returned and Plaintiff had not notified the Court of a change of address. Accordingly, the Court issued an 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.