Unknown

(PC)Ira Pernell Callahan v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20221:22-cv-00221California613 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IRA PERNELL CALLAHAN, Case No.: 1:22-cv-221 JLT BAM Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. THE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE TO

UNKNOWN et al., OBEY A COURT ORDER, AND FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

Defendants. (Doc. 13) 16 The assigned magistrate judge issued a screening order in this case noting, that though Plaintiff complains of safety, policies, and pandemic health protocols at North Kern State Prison, “Plaintiff does not name any defendants. The complaint is in letter form and addressed to ‘To Whom it May Concern’ and appears to be on behalf of all inmates.” (Doc. 11 at 2.) The magistrate judge determined Plaintiff failed “to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 10 and fails to state a cognizable claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.” (Id. at 3.) Therefore, the magistrate judge determined dismissal with leave to amend was appropriate. (Id.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.