(PC)Jones

(PC)Jones v. Ramirez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20222:20-cv-01984California460 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES JONES, No. 2:20-cv-1984 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CURTIS ALLEN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 9, 2022, plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) was screened, and he was given the option of either amending it or proceeding on the cognizable claims raised against defendants Erika Ramirez, Melani de la Vega, and Debrina Sanchez. ECF No. 16 at 4-6, 7. Plaintiff was given fourteen days to inform the court how he wished to proceed. Id. at 7. At that time, plaintiff was also cautioned that his failure to return the notice form would result in a recommendation that defendant Curtis Allen and the claims raised against him…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.