Martinez

Martinez v. Mahoney

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20221:22-cv-00427California1,075 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

25 Plaintiff’s complaint is a single page and names Joselynn Deanna Mahoney as the only 26 Defendant. Substantively, it states as follows: i, require: a ‘court of record’; ‘trial by jury’: claim: trespass [force and arms] i, claim; • said wrongdoer trespass upon my property; • the casual agent of the trespass, comes by the way of force and arms; 2 • the trespass did and does harm and injure my property; • the commencement of the wrong and harm began on September 24th 3 2021; • the wrong and harm continues to this day, of April 12th 2022; • i require compensation for the initial and continual trespass upon my property; • compensation due; four-hundred and fifty thousand dollars; 6 (ECF No, 1, p. 1). Plaintiff has also filed a civil cover sheet, selecting “Diversity” as the 7 basis for this Court’s jurisdiction. (ECF No. 2, p. 1). For nature of the suit, Plaintiff selects 8 “Other Personal Injury.” (Id.). 9 Concluding that Plaintiff failed to allege a basis for subject-matter jurisdiction or 10 state any cognizable concerning his conclusory allegations about Defendant having 11 committed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.