(HC)Harris

(HC)Harris v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20221:22-cv-00601California688 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL J. HARRIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00601-BAK (EPG) (HC)

Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER LEAVE

TO AMEND

v.

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

SEAN MOORE,

TO SEND PETITIONER BLANK § 2254

Respondent. FORMS

14 Petitioner Daniel J. Harris is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of 16 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I. DISCUSSION The Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases (“Habeas Rules”) require preliminary review 20 of a habeas petition and allow a district court to dismiss a petition before the respondent is 21 ordered to file a response, if it “plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that 22 the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 23 Cases in the United States District Courts, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. Habeas Rule 2(c) states that a petition must “(1) specify all the grounds for relief 25 available to the petitioner;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.