Food Market Merchandising, Inc. v. California Milk Processor Board

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20222:15-cv-01083California5,102 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FOOD MARKET MERCHANDIZING, No. 2:15–cv–1083–TLN–CKD

INC.,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE v. ORDER

CALIFORNIA MILK PROCESSOR

BOARD, (ECF No. 126) Defendant.

CALIFORNIA MILK PROCESSOR

BOARD, Counterclaimant, v. FOOD MARKET MERCHANDIZING, INC., et al. 22 Counterdefendants. 23 24 Presently before the court is defendant and counterclaimant California Milk Processor Board (“the CMPB” or “the Board”)’s motion for a protective order limiting the scope of the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition noticed by plaintiff and counterdefendant Food Market Merchandising, 28 Inc. (“FMMI”). (ECF No. 126.) The parties filed a joint statement regarding the discovery dispute. (ECF No. 126.1.) The court heard remote arguments on the motion on June 1, 2022. Thomas Knox appeared for defendant the CMPB; and Howard Sagaser and Carl Christensen appeared for plaintiff FMMI. For the following reasons, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.