Unknown

(PC)Jerry Antivone Castle v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20221:22-cv-00169California432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JERRY ANTIVONE CASTLE, Case No. 1:22-cv-00169-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v. FOURTEEN-DAY RESPONSE PERIOD UNKOWN DEFENDANT, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Jerry Castle, a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 31, 2022. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff’s complaint was not accompanied by the filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (See Docket). Plaintiff’s complaint was transferred from the Central District of California to the Eastern District of California on February 3, 2022. (Doc. No. 4). On February 9, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff to either submit a completed IFP application or pay the $402.00 filing fee within twenty-one days of receipt of the order. (Doc. No. 7). The Court enclosed an IFP application and cautioned Plaintiff that his failure to timely comply with the Court’s order would result in this 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.