Rao

(PC) Bradway v. Rao

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20222:20-cv-00436California7,744 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GABRIEL JOHN BRADWAY, No. 2:20-cv-00436 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, ORDER AND v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS YASHODARA RAO, Defendant. 16 I. Introduction Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that defendant, Dr. Yashodara Rao, violated plaintiff’s Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights and breached an implied contract by authorizing Dr. Karla Solis to allow plaintiff’s single cell status to expire and by failing to intervene to preserve his single cell status. Pending before this Court are defendant’s summary judgment motion and two requests for judicial notice in support of its motion for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 70 & 77-1.) Plaintiff also filed three motions: (1) an objection to one of defendant’s requests for judicial notice (ECF No. 79); (2) a second statement of disputed facts (ECF No. 78); and (3) a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.