McClough
(PC) Driver v. McClough
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY DRIVER, JR., Case No. 2:21-cv-01142-JAM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO
v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE
DENIED
MCLOUGH, et al., ECF No. 6 Defendants.
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE
17 18 19 20 Plaintiff has filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 6. He is, as I explained in my previous order, ECF No. 12, a “three-striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff was previously determined to have filed at least three cases that were dismissed for failure to state a viable claim. See Driver v. U.S. Special Master, No. 1:17-cv- 0202-DAD-BAM (E.D. Cal. 2018) at ECF Nos. 7 & 9. Three-strikers may still proceed in forma 26 1 In this case, Judge McAuliffe found that plaintiff had filed three cases that were dismissed for failure to state a claim: (1) Driver v. Martel, Case No. 2:08-cv-01910-GEB-EFB (E.D. Cal.) (dismissed September 16, 2009, for…