Ayon

(PC) Jones v. Ayon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20221:21-cv-00809California459 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEREMY JONES ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00809-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS ACTION

AYON, et al., ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Defendants. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS ) AND DEFENDANTS ) ) (ECF No. 25) )

Plaintiff Jeremy Jones is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 19, 2022, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and found a cognizable retaliation claim against only Defendant Ayon. (ECF No. 18.) However, Plaintiff fails to state any other cognizable claims for relief. Therefore, Plaintiff was informed that he could file an amended complaint or a notice of intent to proceed on the claims found to be cognizable. (Id.) On June 3, 2022, Plaintiff timely…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.