Boyd

FILED

attest and certify on Jun 01,2022. that the foregoing cued Max coatom © )| UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL. souintn bare oF □□□□□□□ wy on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA CALIFORNIA Fl L E D UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS LITIGATION Jun 06, 2022 MDL No. 2992

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRANSFER ORDER

Before the Panel:* Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”) moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407(c) for transfer of the action listed on Schedule A (Boyd) to the Southern District of California for inclusion in MDL No. 2992. Plaintiff did not respond to the motion and, therefore, is deemed to acquiesce to it. See Panel Rule 6.1(c). After considering the argument of counsel, we find that the Boyd action involves common questions of fact with the actions transferred to MDL No. 2992, and that transfer under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 will serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation. The actions in the MDL involve BANA’s conduct in distributing unemployment benefits for the California Employment Development Department (“EDD”).…