Quick

(PC) Jackson v. Quick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20221:19-cv-01591California349 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CORNEL JACKSON, Case No.: 1:19-cv-01591-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. DEFENDANT KASANDRA SANCHEZ

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

JASON QUICK, et al., COMPLETE SERVICE

Defendants. (Doc. 114)

16 Cornel Jackson is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 11, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to complete service upon defendant Kasandra Sanchez as required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). (Doc. 114 at 3.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended Sanchez be dismissed as a defendant. (Id.) The Court provided the parties 14 days to file any objections to the Findings and Recommendations. (Doc. 114 at 3.) The Court advised the parties that “failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.