(PC) Driver v. Kern County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20222:20-cv-01665California2,224 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY DRIVER, JR., No. 2: 20-cv-1665 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are plaintiff’s motions to compel filed April 15, 2022, and May 12, 2022. (ECF. Nos. 142, 151.) For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motions to compel are denied. Plaintiff’s Claims To put plaintiff’s motions to compel in context, the undersigned herein sets forth plaintiff’s claims. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s amended complaint against defendant Dr. Bansal, Dr. Rauf and Maya. (ECF No. 13.) Defendant Bansal is employed at the California Medical Facility (“CMF”). Defendant Rauf and Maya are employed at Kern Valley State Prison (“KVSP”). Plaintiff alleges that in 2020, these defendants violated the Eighth Amendment when they denied plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.