(PS) Crenshaw v. The Arbors at Antelope

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL CRENSHAW, No. 2:22-cv-000711 TLN AC PS Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION THE ARBORS AT ANTELOPE, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Carl Crenshaw is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff previously filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and submitted the affidavit required by that statute; that request was granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), ECF No. 3. In the order granting IFP status, the undersigned declined to serve plaintiff’s complaint and provided plaintiff an opportunity to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint within the designated timeframe. ECF No. 4. The First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) is now before the undersigned for screening. I. SCREENING The federal IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the…