Driver
Driver v. Fresno US Court
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 BILLY DRIVER, Case No. 1:22-cv-00623-DAD-SKO 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO PROCEED v. IN FORMA PAUPERIS 14 FRESNO US COURT, et al., (Doc. 2) 15 Defendants. TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
17 Plaintiff, Billy Driver, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil action, which he filed on May 24, 2022. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 on May 24, 2022. (Doc. 2.) I. DISCUSSION The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”)’s “three strikes” provision, found at 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), provides as follows: 24 In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action . . . under this section if the prisoner has, on three or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained . . ., brought an action . . . in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the ground that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which…