Brooks

Brooks v. Morphe, LLC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20222:20-cv-01219California2,432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Valerie Brooks, No. 2:20-cv-01219-KJM-DB Plaintiff, ORDER v. Morphe LLC, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Valerie Brooks, who is legally blind, brought this action on behalf of a proposed class of 18 visually impaired internet users. She alleges Morphe LLC operates a website that is not 19 accessible to the visually impaired, and she moves now to certify the proposed class. Because she 20 has not shown the class is “so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a)(1), and that class counsel will “fairly and adequately protect the interests of the 22 class,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a)(4), the motion is denied without prejudice to renewal, as explained 23 in this order. 24 I. BACKGROUND According to Brooks’s complaint, Morphe operates morphe.com, a website for affordable makeup. Compl. {9 5, 22, ECF No. 1. She alleges morphe.com is not accessible to people who…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.