Tri-Dam

Tri-Dam v. Frazier

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20221:20-cv-00408California4,669 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRI-DAM, Case No. 1:20-cv-00408-SKO

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

v. M JUO DT GIO MN E NT TO AC NL DA R OI RFY D EO RR A A NM DE FN OD R A STAY OF PART OF THE JUDGMENT

SCOTT FRAZIER,

(Doc. 64) Defendant. _____________________________________/

16 Before the Court is Defendant Scott Frazier (“Defendant”)’s Motion to Clarify or Amend Judgment and Order and for Stay of Part of the Judgment (the “Motion”). (Doc. 64.) For the reasons provided herein, the Court will grant in part and deny in part the Motion.1 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND2 Plaintiff Tri-Dam (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendant, alleging causes of action for violation of the Federal Power Act (“FPA”), 16 U.S.C. § 825p, public nuisance, private nuisance, trespass, and interference with express easement. (Doc. 1.) On October 20, 2021, the parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.