(PS) Khan v. U.S. Bank National Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20222:22-cv-00954California1,587 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KHALID N. KHAN, No. 2:22-cv-00954 KJM AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and S.A. CHALLENGER, INC., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and has submitted the affidavit required by that statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). ECF No. 2. The motion to proceed IFP will therefore be GRANTED. I. The Screening Requirement The federal IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff must assist the court in determining whether…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.