Parks

(PC) Harris v. Parks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20221:19-cv-00429California450 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TEVIN LEE HARRIS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00429-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

CONSTRUED MOTION TO INITIATE

v. SCREENING

E. PARKS, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

CONSTRUED MOTION REQUESTING

Defendant. RECEIPT OF HIS CHANGE OF ADDRESS 16 (Doc. No. 45) 18 Plaintiff, Tevin Harris, is a current state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on his Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. Nos. 9, 41). Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s pleading seeking judicial notice which the Court construes as a motion requesting the Court to screen his TAC and acknowledge that the Clerk received his notice of his change of address. (Doc. No. 45 at 1). District courts possess inherent authority not governed “by rule or statute, but by control necessarily vested in courts to manage their own affairs so as to achieve the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.