(HC) Conley v. Stanislaus County Public Defenders Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20221:22-cv-00680California1,459 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH CONLEY, No. 1:22-cv-00680-SKO (HC) Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

v. FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST STATE

REMEDIES

STANISLAUS COUNTY PUBLIC ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER

DEFENDER’S OFFICE, et al., LEAVE TO AMEND PETITION TO NAME

A PROPER RESPONDENT

Respondents. [TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE]

18 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner filed the instant habeas petition on June 6. 2022, challenging the sentence he received on his 2021 conviction in Stanislaus County Superior Court. The petition appears to be unexhausted and Petitioner will be ordered to show cause why it should not be dismissed without prejudice. Petitioner has also failed to name a proper respondent, and will be granted leave to amend the petition to name a proper respondent. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.