(HC) Conley v. Stanislaus County Public Defenders Office
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20221:22-cv-00680California1,459 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH CONLEY, No. 1:22-cv-00680-SKO (HC) Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
v. FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST STATE
REMEDIES
STANISLAUS COUNTY PUBLIC ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER
DEFENDER’S OFFICE, et al., LEAVE TO AMEND PETITION TO NAME
A PROPER RESPONDENT
Respondents. [TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE]
18 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner filed the instant habeas petition on June 6. 2022, challenging the sentence he received on his 2021 conviction in Stanislaus County Superior Court. The petition appears to be unexhausted and Petitioner will be ordered to show cause why it should not be dismissed without prejudice. Petitioner has also failed to name a proper respondent, and will be granted leave to amend the petition to name a proper respondent. …