(SS) Feliciano v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 8, 20221:20-cv-01627California7,270 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTONIO FELICIANO, Case No. 1:20-cv-01627-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

SECURITY APPEAL AND REMANDING

v. ACTION TO COMMISSIONER FOR

FURTHER PROCEEDINGS

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (ECF Nos. 20, 21, 22) Defendant. 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Antonio Feliciano (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for Social Security disability benefits pursuant to Title II of the Social Security Act. The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument, to Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s appeal shall be granted, and the action shall be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. 27 The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.