Tyler
Tyler v. Valley MRI and Radiology, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Richard and Arretta Tyler, No. 2:19-cv-00651-KJM-AC Plaintiffs, ORDER v. Valley MRI and Radiology, Inc., et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Atretta Tyler moves for summary judgment of her claims that defendants Valley MRI and Radiology and Sonoma Federal LLC discriminated against her on the basis of a disability. Key 19 factual disputes remain unresolved, so the motion is denied. 20 I. BACKGROUND Ms. Tyler has undergone several back surgeries and has trouble standing and walking. Defs.’ Resp. Stmt. Facts Nos. 1-2, ECF No. 24-1. In May 2018, she and her husband drove from 23 their home in Woodbridge, California to Valley MRI and Radiology in Stockton, a medical 24 facility. 7d. No. 4. Valley MRI has two parking lots. See Pls.’ Exs. at 123, ECF No. 20-4; Miyaki Decl. § 4, ECF No. 24-3. One of the parking lots has designated, accessible parking 26 spaces; the other does not. Miyaki Decl. …